theconcealedweapon:

image

They could have just given everyone in the country $4,500.

Think of how many people could afford to stay home from work if they had an extra $4,500.

And that’s per person. Imagine if a family of four had an extra $18,000.

But I guess that would be socialism, which apparently is okay only when it benefits the rich.

(via cha1upa-supreme)

thefingerfuckingfemalefury:

galgadotsource:

“Wonder Woman does not carry a weapon. We had an intention to let go of the sword, because there’s something very aggressive with a sword. If you have a sword, it means you need to use it. So we wanted to give that up. And we didn’t feel that the shield was necessary either. She’s a goddess, she can fight, she’s super strong, and she has the skills. So no, she has the gauntlets. She has the lasso. She has her tiara and that’s about it.” Gal Gadot on why Diana won’t use a sword or a shield in the sequel.

This makes sense since when she is fighting regular foes and not in the middle of a war like she was in the first film Diana does try to find a non-lethal way to stop them whenever she can <3

(via linneart)

venomtots:

venomtots:

Real talk though has anyone else just thrown away a whole Tupperware container bc you left food in there for way too long and now you’re afraid to open it?

All of you are so valid

(via hipssway-lipslie)


Indy Theme by Safe As Milk